I am writing as a freelance worker and member of the trade union Bectu to register my views on the government's Timely Payment consultation. I strongly oppose any approach that reduces flexibility for taxpayers with fluctuating incomes or risks requiring workers to pay tax based on earnings they have not yet received.
Any changes to the way Income Tax Self-Assessment is paid must recognise the realities of freelance work in the creative industries and ensure that workers with irregular incomes are not disadvantaged. It is vital that any new system is flexible, supports financial stability, and reflects the way creative freelancers actually work.
Freelancers are the backbone of the UK’s world leading creative industries. Creative sector work is characterised by short-term contracts, project-based work and multiple income streams. Workers frequently move between PAYE employment, self-employment, limited company arrangements and periods without work, often within the same tax year. Bectu's 2025 Big Survey found that almost half of respondents identified as freelancers, while only one in five workers reported feeling secure in their work, falling to just 13% among freelancers.
ITSA Payments Through PAYE
More regular payment of tax may benefit workers with stable earnings by reducing large year-end liabilities. However, many creative workers do not have predictable income patterns.
Bectu members frequently combine PAYE and self-employed work, move between different employment statuses and experience periods of unemployment between contracts. Eligibility for payment through PAYE should therefore not assume continuous employment. Workers must be able to move easily between PAYE collection and alternative payment arrangements without creating additional complexity or financial pressure.
Forecasting future liabilities presents particular challenges in the creative industries. Recent disruptions in film and television production have demonstrated how quickly income can change. Bectu's 2025 survey found that 43% of screen industry workers were not currently working and only 16% reported their employment had fully recovered following recent industry disruption.
Even in good times, income is often highly volatile. Periods of intensive work may be followed by weeks or months without earnings. Bectu's research found that 66% of creative workers are struggling financially, 31% of freelancers have no savings, and more than one-third have experienced cashflow difficulties because of late payment. Any reform must therefore prioritise flexibility, recognise income volatility and avoid creating hardship for workers with irregular earnings. Historic earnings data alone is unlikely to provide an accurate basis for forecasting future tax liabilities.
While HMRC may wish to use Making Tax Digital (MTD) data to support forecasting, taxpayers and agents must retain the ability to update forecasts quickly and easily when circumstances change.
Strong safeguards will be essential. Workers should be able to reduce or pause forecast payments where income falls unexpectedly and should not be penalised where reasonable forecasts later prove inaccurate. Particular consideration should be given to:
The government should also ensure payroll systems and guidance adequately support employers and payroll operators in sectors where short-term employment is common.
Reform of Payments on Account
More frequent payments may help some taxpayers budget more effectively. However, for workers with irregular earnings, they may create additional cashflow pressures unless sufficient flexibility is built into the system.
A key principle should be the ability to respond quickly to changing circumstances. Creative workers may experience cancelled contracts, delayed productions, postponed commissions or sudden reductions in work. Taxpayers should therefore be able to amend forecasts, reduce payments or access temporary payment holidays without excessive administrative burdens or penalties.
Practical support should include forecasting tools, advance notifications of liabilities, and accessible guidance for taxpayers and agents.
Support should also be available through non-digital channels. Particular attention should be given to taxpayers with fluctuating incomes, disabled workers, older freelancers and those with limited digital confidence.
Implementation should be gradual and carefully managed. Taxpayers should not face a situation where they are simultaneously paying liabilities arising under the existing system while making payments under a new one. For workers on irregular incomes, this could create significant financial strain.
Given the scale of wider tax administration changes, including Making Tax Digital for Income Tax, a phased transition with clear communication and appropriate easements will be essential.
Creative workers often face periods of intensive work with limited time to deal with administration. Additional reporting and payment requirements should not result in disproportionate penalties where taxpayers miss deadlines as a result of atypical working patterns. Clear communications, proportionate penalty regimes and flexible processes will be vital.
Finally, flexibility and taxpayer choice should remain central to any reforms. Given the diversity of working arrangements across the creative industries, taxpayers who combine PAYE and Self Assessment income should be able to choose the payment mechanism that best reflects their circumstances, whether through PAYE deductions, Payments on Account or Direct Debit arrangements.